October 18th, 2009
- I have a project I've decided is worth trying to pursue, and I'm wasting no time researching it. It dawned on me early this morning, as I was about six thousand feet in the air. And, even more, I've found a way to link Chronos to this new endeavor.
*This is a premature articulation of the thoughts that are streaming through my head, but I'll try to articulate them in the best way possible so when I come back to Journal Entry #3, I can use it as a gage for my progress. I have a lot of research to do and the things I explain as "a matter of fact" are, for right now, just theories in themselves. I have much more to do before I can state the following paragraphs as proof.
I've come to find that there are many moving parts associated with living as a human being. With science as the foundation of everything, there is a way to figure out the truth behind life (meaning the scientific explanation, the philosophy that guides a man, whether or not he wants to exercise it is a different story) and the rules in which man are to follow in order to live that life. Rules, meaning a system in which to follow, a set of laws, regulations. There are natural laws, which state that man must eat, drink, breathe, sleep (which is a major waste of time as far as I'm concerned, but nonetheless), etc. in order to survive. By nature, the man who doesn't breathe doesn't live. Humans are the dominant animal and have been for millions of years; evolution has not stopped occurring, but I predict it has reached its peak with man. We possess an ideal body type and the biggest advancement to date: cognition. That is the key, the driving force: the ability to build myelin, which in turn builds skill, talent, ideas, buildings and motors. This has changed natural selection as Darwin saw in the 1800's. It changed n.s. with every cognitive revolution: The Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and our rise in technology... every time man molds nature to fit his purpose, n.s. changes the way it runs its course. Nature must follow its own rules, but when it (nature) is changed by a certain group, within certain boundaries, I think the way nature affects that group isn't as it once was.
For instance, place a man in the desert and tell him to find his way out. He is not built like the animals that live in those harsh conditions: his skin will burn, he will lose water in the form of sweat, he will lose energy as time goes by, which will cause him to grow weak if he doesn’t replenish himself with food and water. What happens internally is far worse and will eventually cost him his life if he doesn't use the only thing that can, and always will, help him survive and use it fast: his mind. That is the key. Now, place a water snake, a garden snake, or a python in the desert and you can predict the outcome- they would die with very little chance of escape. Why is that, when some of the inhabitants of deserts are in fact species of snakes to begin with? Those that inhabit the desert have been adapted to their environment over thousands, perhaps millions, of years and have the ability to blend in with their environment in order to catch any other species that live there, can go months* without water, and so on so forth. (This is part one: Physical adaptation vs. mental creativity, which will be tied to evolution). Placing a snake that thrives in the water would be an obvious disaster, but place a human being in the desert, with is another obvious disaster as far as traits are concerned, but now the odds of survival have increased greatly just because he is man. This is, what I think, the prime example of our own evolution as a species.
*Time lengths, species and habitat not researched before writing.
Now, using the same environment, let us place a baby in the place of a grown man…death. Let us place a retarded adult in the place of the baby…death. Let’s place a child in the place of the retarded adult, and then the story starts to change. They are still dependant on being rescued, but they may find a way to prolong death by hours or days. The example is the same in the rain forest, on an island, or in the city- only the man who has developed his mind will, and can, survive. (Part two, which will be tied to the philosophy of Objectivism)
So what are the things I've decided to pursue?
Some of my questions are the following: What niche have man begun to fill speaking in evolutionary terms? We can go to any environment, with the proper equipment, and be able to not only survive, but in the cases where man has thrived against physical odds… underwater, by means of a submarine and oxygen tanks; cold, harsh conditions by means of insulation and fishing poles, etc. These varying equipments only exist because someone created them, and someone created them only because they used their minds. And the pattern continues: a man with the proper equipment can still die in any environment if 1) they use the equipment wrong, 2) they use the equipment poorly, or 3) they choose not to use it at all. They can die in the middle of an ocean or in the middle of a city – Natural Selection will then work in the same way it always has. But with each success or disaster the outcome stems from the same thing: the mind.
1) What happens from here on out to Natural Selection when it is no longer working from the forces of nature? *as it once was
2) What does that mean for humans, and what does our evolution look like, from a biological stand point? *in comparison to other animals
3) Which laws and rules, in both nature and for man, are the irreducible primaries… the things that will never change?